Compare continuous movement-led display impact against staff-based storefront activation for long retail operating windows.
| Criteria | Moving Mannequin | Human Brand Ambassador |
|---|---|---|
| Consistency | Consistent display behavior across store hours | Variable by staffing and shift quality |
| Scalability | Standardized multi-store rollout model | Labor-heavy expansion model |
| Operating cost profile | Predictable rental/purchase framework | Recurring staffing and management cost |
| Campaign style | Visual magnet effect for windows | Conversation-led engagement at close range |
Rental starts from AUD 300/month. Best results come from campaign-led deployment, not static long-term installation.
Why moving mannequins outperform static mannequins
Attention lift
Moving displays stop more passers-by than static windows in competitive streets.
Social amplification
People are more likely to film, share, and tag your storefront when the display moves.
Walk-in growth
Higher window curiosity usually translates into more qualified store visits.
Premium brand signal
Your store feels more advanced, modern, and high-value at first glance.
Faster ROI path
Entry from AUD 300/month keeps risk low while testing measurable uplift.
Results depend on location, offer, and execution, but motion-led displays consistently increase memorability compared to static mannequin-only setups.
Turn your storefront into a traffic magnet
Start from AUD 300/month. We help you pick the right mannequin model, launch quickly, and measure attention + walk-in impact before scaling.
Prefer email? info@motionmannequin.com
FAQ
Can both be combined?
Yes. Some retailers run movement for attraction and human staff for assisted conversion in-store.
Which is better for long hours?
Moving mannequin provides more consistent storefront impact across extended operating hours.